The Nice and Naughty List: How to Pick New Software

Selecting new law firm software can be a daunting prospect.  There are so many options, that attorneys are often waylaid by a paralysis of analysis, and then don’t end up making any positive changes at all.  This is why a lot of law firms end up relying on old and obsolete technologies, rather than updating to modern tools.  Once again, inertia becomes the single worst enemy of law firms. 



But, when lawyers do end up selecting specific softwares, they often do so in a hasty manner, just to ensure the painful process ends quickly.  In that case, the selected software is often not a good fit for the law firm, so that attorneys and staff end up wasting time building inefficient workarounds, that dress up the problem, and make the software just a little more palatable for the law firm’s use case. 

 

Neither option is particularly compelling. 

 

And, the truth of the matter is that the process of selecting the right software for a law firm is not an easy one, and it takes more effort than most attorneys have traditionally been willing to put in. 

 

But, there’s a simple tactic you can use, to make better software choices, and to make sure that your software’s not using you.  The strategy is as follows: Make two lists.  One list is the ‘nice list’ = software features that you really want in a particular category, e.g. – law practice management software.  The other list is the ‘naughty list’ = things you hate about your current software application.  So, when you’re looking for a new tool, see if it offers the required features (from the nice list), and find out whether it fixes the things you hate about your old software (from the naughty list).  That way (and, even if you do nothing else), you’ll stand a much better chance of picking software that will actually fit your law firm, versus software that’s gonna act like a square peg, that you’ll need to ram into a round hole. 

 

. . .

Need an assist in choosing software tools that fit your law firm, we can help! 

Through a unique partnership between the bar association and Jared Correia's Red Cave Law Firm Consulting, National Creditors' Bar Association members now have access to experienced law practice management consultants at a special discount rate. To get started, visit Red Cave's NCBA landing page, and start running your law practice like a business.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top Shelf: How to Maximize Lawyer Staff in a Modern Law Firm

Image
Broadly speaking, lawyers take on too much.  You know: at work, emotionally.  They’re probably also trying to carry too many grocery bags into the house at one time.  You know how it is.     This, of course, leads to a whole host of problems, including that attorneys have higher incidences of alcohol and drug dependence, as well as depression, than does the general population .  Maybe you already knew that.  But, the fact is that this also has a direct effect on how much a lawyer can make. Hear me out: Because lawyers try to do everything, and to do everything perfectly, they’re also more prone than the general population to take on more work than they need to.  For example, they’re unwilling to delegate, including to paralegal and administrative staff, but also to other attorneys.  That means that lawyers end up being chief cook and bottlewasher, rather than focusing on the high-end work (strategy , client engagement), that they get paid the most for.     That’s why developing proces
Read more

Hiring Percentage: What is the Law Firm Hit Rate for Bringing on Staff?

Image
Some lawyer s get burned hiring staff, whether it’s legal assistant s , paralegals or other attorneys .  But, just because you miss out once, in trying to hire somebody, doesn’t mean you should give up forever .  There are distinct advantages to bring ing on employees, including increased control over work product + improved revenue generation models.   In my experience, I’ve found that law firms connect on a successful hire (across all employee categories) about 40% of the time .  That may seem like a low number , but it represents about a 50% hit rate, meaning that every other hire should yield a viable staffperson , who’ll stay on between 3-5 years – which is not too bad, in the modern economy.     Putting that into baseball terms, which folks often do when trying to rationalize failure : your hiring batting average as a law firm, is about equivalent to Ted Williams’ 1941 season , when he was the last baseball player to hit .400 over a full seasons . . . over 80 years ago.
Read more

New or Noob: How Law Firms Tend to Hire

Image
Every lawyer I’ve ever met wants to do everything on their own.  In other words, every lawyer secretly desires to be a solo attorney.  Of course, there comes a time when your business grow s  to the point that you need some real help; and, since you can’t clone yourself, it’s necessary to hire.   Many attorneys who start to hire want to do so as cheaply as possible; and, that often means, in addition to  probably not offering substantial benefits (or, maybe opting for a contractor), that lawyer will hire another attorney or paralegal or legal assistant with little to no experience.  The low salary is appealing, as is the presumed clean slate being offered: you can train someone up now, exactly the way you want to.   But, that line of thinking can be replete with holes.  In the first instance, this notion of law firm training is more theory than practice -- as this purported intensive training for attorneys and paralegals and legal assistants doesn’t really ever materialize
Read more